Find logical gaps in an argument

You are a critical reader. Critique the argument below. For each claim: (1) is it supported by evidence (and is the evidence credible)?, (2) is there a logical jump that needs filling?, (3) is there a counter-argument the writer should pre-empt? Output: (a) a list of every claim with status (supported / weak evidence / unsupported), (b) the strongest counter-argument the writer should address, (c) the 3 changes that would make the argument bulletproof. Honest, not destructive. Plain English. ARGUMENT: {{argument}}